Provider directories might not grab headlines, but they play a crucial role in the healthcare ecosystem. These directories list healthcare providers within a plan's network, including their locations, specialties, and contact information. When they're inaccurate—and let's be honest, they often are—it can lead to significant patient access issues and billing headaches.
The Consequences of Inaccuracies
Imagine a patient selecting a provider from a directory only to find that this provider isn't actually in-network. Welcome to denied claims territory. The patient could be hit with unexpected out-of-pocket costs. Meanwhile, the provider's billing team faces extra work to appeal the denial or negotiate with the payer. And yes, this is as frustrating as it sounds.
From a billing perspective, inaccurate directories can trigger Denial Code 96: Non-covered charge(s). It's not just a nuisance—it can mean the difference between a claim being paid or left to rot in A/R purgatory. Worse, it can damage patient trust. No one wants to hear a patient say, “But your office said you were in-network.”
Maintenance Requirements: What’s Expected?
Payers are required to maintain accurate and up-to-date provider directories. This sounds reasonable enough until you consider the details. For a plan to comply with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) requirements, directories must be updated at least quarterly. And with California's SB 137, the stakes are even higher—mandating updates within 30 business days of a change.
Does that mean the directories are always accurate? Hardly. The reality is that many directories fall short, despite these requirements. Practices should verify their listings regularly—monthly is advisable, quarterly is minimum. This means checking addresses, phone numbers, and, most importantly, network status.
Why Directories Go Stale
Provider directories often become outdated for several reasons. Provider information changes frequently—think relocations, additions of new providers, or network status changes. Communication breakdowns between providers and payers don't help either. Providers rely on payers to update listings, while payers rely on providers to notify them of changes. When either party drops the ball, patients and billing teams pay the price.
The Billing Impact
For billing teams already navigating the labyrinth of insurance regulations and EOBs, inaccurate directories add another layer of complexity. The most immediate impact is on denial management. If directory inaccuracies lead to a denial, billers have to spend extra time investigating the issue, contacting the payer, and resubmitting the claim. This isn't just tedious—it diverts resources from other crucial billing tasks.
And let's not overlook the impact on cash flow. Delayed payments can disrupt the financial stability of a practice. Keeping directories accurate isn't just about compliance; it's about ensuring revenue cycles aren't unnecessarily extended.
What Can Practices Do?
Practices aren't powerless in this scenario. Here are pragmatic steps to minimize directory-related issues:
Regular Audits: Conduct routine checks of all published directory entries. Remember, a quarterly check is the bare minimum.
Direct Communication: Keep open lines of communication with payers. When you notice inaccuracies, don't wait for them to fix it at their leisure—be proactive.
Notification of Changes: Notify payers as soon as possible about any provider or practice changes. Set up internal processes to ensure this happens consistently.
Monitor Denials: Track denials that seem linked to directory errors. Recurring issues could indicate systemic problems that need more than a one-time fix.
Forward-Thinking Practices
With the rise of AI and data analytics, there may soon be more automated solutions to keep directories accurate. Imagine a system that alerts you to possible directory discrepancies before they cause denials. While such tools are still on the horizon for many, practices should keep an eye out for these innovations.
For now, diligence is the best defense. The effort to maintain accurate provider directory information is well worth it. In a system already burdened with enough complexities, eliminating one more point of failure is a step towards smoother billing operations.
Accurate directories—an unsung hero of efficient billing.
Related Articles
