Effectively managing accounts receivable (A/R) follow-up is critical for any healthcare practice aiming to maintain a healthy cash flow. There's no one-size-fits-all approach. But prioritizing claims by their age and financial value—while considering payer-specific quirks—can streamline your efforts and ensure higher recovery rates. Let's dive into the nuts and bolts of this essential process.
Using Aging Buckets to Guide Strategy
Every biller knows that the older a claim gets, the less likely it is to be paid. Therefore, structuring your follow-up strategy around aging buckets is non-negotiable. Most practices use 30-day increments to categorize their A/R: 0-30, 31-60, 61-90, and over 90 days.
Start with the 61-90 day bucket. Claims in this range are often in a sweet spot where payer delays have been resolved, and issues like coding errors might become apparent. They're not yet stale, but they're aging fast. This is where proactive follow-up can make a significant impact. Prioritizing claims in this bucket usually yields better results before they slip into the over 90 days wasteland where denials are often more difficult to overturn.
For the over 90 days bucket, focus on claims with higher dollar amounts first. The effort-to-reward ratio is critical here, as pursuing smaller amounts might not justify the time and resources. That said, don't entirely ignore lower-value claims—you can batch these for resolution in bulk when time allows.
Setting Dollar Thresholds
Dollar thresholds serve as a secondary filter for prioritizing claims, enabling your team to concentrate on cases that will most improve cash flow. A practice might decide that any claim over $500 deserves immediate attention, regardless of its age. This quick influx of cash can significantly influence financial health.
But don't just set these thresholds arbitrarily. Use historical data to identify which dollar amounts frequently result in further denials or require extensive back-and-forth with payers. Maybe claims between $200-$500 notoriously linger because they fall under the radar. Addressing these can sometimes rectify longstanding revenue leaks.
Payer-Specific Strategies
Nuances in dealing with different payers can dramatically affect the speed and success of your A/R follow-up. Some payers are notorious for their slow processing times or complex requirements. For example, UnitedHealthcare might have longer hold times but straightforward online appeal options. In contrast, Blue Cross Blue Shield might require extensive documentation but offer faster resolutions if their conditions are met precisely.
Identify these quirks and make them part of your follow-up playbook. Does a particular payer have a portal feature that speeds things up, or is their online chat option more efficient than phone calls? Knowing these details can shave days off the follow-up timeline.
For instance, some payers are quick to downcode E/M services based on perceived documentation insufficiencies. If you're dealing with a payer known for this, ensure your team reviews and enhances documentation before contacting them. This proactive step reduces back-and-forth and accelerates resolution.
Integrate Automation Cautiously
Automation can be a formidable ally in your A/R follow-up strategy—if used wisely. Automated systems can categorize claims by age and value more efficiently than human staff, freeing up your team to handle more complex cases. But don't go on autopilot. Claims often require human intuition and problem-solving skills that automation lacks.
Automated reminders or alerts can be set for specific aging buckets or high-value claims to ensure they get the attention they deserve on a timely basis. Just be sure these systems are flexible enough to be adjusted as payer behaviors and internal priorities change.
Regular Review and Adjustment
The realm of medical billing is anything but static. Payers change their rules, and your practice evolves. Regularly review your A/R follow-up strategy to ensure it's aligned with current realities. For instance, if Medicare's rules on telehealth reimbursement have shifted, your follow-up approach must adapt to reflect those changes.
Conduct quarterly reviews of your A/R data. Look for patterns—claims from a certain payer consistently dragging on, or specific types of claims that frequently get denied. Use these insights to tweak your follow-up priorities or to decide if your dollar thresholds need revising.
Takeaway: A Dynamic Approach Wins
In managing A/R follow-up, rigidity is your enemy. The combination of aging buckets, dollar thresholds, and payer-specific tactics creates a dynamic framework that adapts to your practice's needs. This structured yet flexible approach ensures that your team isn't running in circles, but instead making informed, strategic decisions that drive results. In a world where every dollar counts, that's not just smart—it's necessary.
Related Articles
