Denial Code CO 247 is one of those irksome denials that can sneak up on even the most cautious billing teams. It points to a simple problem: a non-payable or informational CPT/HCPCS code was billed. Seems straightforward, right? Yet, this denial can lead to unnecessary delays and extra work if not handled correctly. Let's dig into the specifics and tackle this head-on.
Understanding CO 247
When a claim comes back with CO 247, it means the payer identified a code submitted that cannot be reimbursed. It's not about errors in patient information or missing documentation—this one's all about the codes themselves. Some codes fall into the category of non-payable or informational. They exist not to generate payment, but to provide additional information about the service rendered.
Non-Payable and Informational Codes
Non-payable codes often serve as markers for processes that don't directly involve patient care but support it in some way. For example, educational services or administrative tasks that don't get direct compensation. Informational codes, on the other hand, don't trigger payment but offer insight into the services provided. They might capture the complexity of a procedure or the unique circumstances under which it was performed.
These codes play vital roles in data aggregation and analysis, but they don't directly bring in revenue. Knowing which codes fall into these categories is crucial for avoiding CO 247 denials.
Common Offenders
Here's where it gets practical. Which codes are most likely to earn this denial?
G-codes: These are often informational. G-codes might detail the quality measures a practice adheres to, but won’t result in payments themselves.
S-codes: Generally, these state-specific codes are used by Medicaid and certain private payers. They're vital for process transparency but typically non-payable.
Category II CPT codes: Used for performance measurement, these codes track physician and practice performance but don't result in direct payments.
Knowing these can save time and effort—ensuring claims are clean before submission.
Real World Impacts
Consider the example of a mid-sized practice using G-codes to report on Medicare quality measures. Each claim involving a G-code that’s inadvertently linked to a payable expectation may receive a CO 247. The result? Billing staff scramble to resubmit claims, review submitted codes, and handle increased volumes of corrections.
For a practice processing hundreds of claims daily, even a 5% denial rate due to CO 247 can translate to significant delays in reimbursement and increased administrative costs. Real dollars, real problems. This isn’t just a nuisance—it can impact cash flow.
Avoiding the Trap
Preventing CO 247 denials requires robustness in the billing process. Here’s how:
Rigorous Training
Billing teams should stay sharp on which codes are non-payable. Regular training sessions can help—whether it’s a monthly review or utilizing online resources to keep up with coding changes. Payers update coding guidelines frequently, and ignorance is costly.
Claim Scrubbing
Implement a thorough claim scrubbing process that checks for these non-payable codes before submission. Use software tools that flag potential CO 247s. While no system is perfect, automation can catch those pesky codes more reliably than manual processes alone.
Payer-Specific Policies
Every payer is different. Understanding payer-specific policies regarding non-payable codes is essential. Some payers may have unique quirks or exceptions that aren’t immediately apparent. Keep a repository of these nuances—accessible and updated.
The Way Forward
Dealing with denial code CO 247 isn’t just about fixing errors—it's about preventing them in the first place. Streamlining billing processes and enhancing team knowledge can fortify against these denials. But what if the codes are properly non-billable and the denial is incorrect? It’s not uncommon for payers to reject codes errantly—another layer of complexity that requires vigilance and follow-up.
So, what’s the takeaway? Arm your team with the knowledge of these non-payable codes, leverage technology to catch potential errors, and stay tuned into payer policies. Mastering this denial code isn't just damage control—it's a proactive step toward efficient revenue cycle management.
Related Articles
