All Articles

Denial Code CO 107 Explained: Related or Inclusive Procedure

CO 107 means your procedure is related to or inclusive of another on the same claim. Learn how to unbundle when appropriate.

CO 107 means your procedure is related to or inclusive of another on the same claim. Learn how to unbundle when appropriate.

CO 107 means your procedure is related to or inclusive of another on the same claim. Learn how to unbundle when appropriate.

Denial Code CO 107 is a familiar thorn in the side of many billing teams. You think you've got all your ducks in a row, but the payer drops this bomb: your procedure is related to or inclusive of another on the same claim. It’s like telling a surgeon that the stitches were part of the incision — maddening.

Understanding CO 107

At its core, CO 107 suggests that the procedure you're billing for is bundled with another service. This could be part of a pre-set bundle like an all-inclusive surgery package or a misunderstanding where the payer assumes overlap. The implications? If not challenged, your practice could lose revenue on legitimate services.

Payers apply CO 107 based on procedural logic — usually guided by the National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI). NCCI edits are designed to prevent improper payments when incorrect code combinations are reported. So when CO 107 shows up, it's often because the payer believes the billed service was an expected part of another procedure.

Common Scenarios

Consider a patient undergoing knee surgery. The primary procedure might cover everything: incision, removal of damaged tissue, and closure. If billed separately, closure might trigger CO 107 denial — the payer expects it included in the main surgery code.

Another example: a comprehensive preventive exam bundled with a focused visit for a specific complaint. If both are billed on the same day, expect the payer to flag the latter as included.

Strategies to Unbundle

So, how can you combat CO 107 without pulling your hair out? It starts with a thorough initial claim submission — but let’s be real, sometimes details slip through. When you get that denial, here are steps to take:

Verify Documentation

First, ensure your documentation explicitly supports the separate nature of the services. Does the medical record clearly differentiate between the procedures? If documentation is lacking, you’ll have a tough fight ahead.

Use Modifiers Wisely

Modifiers are your best friend when fighting CO 107. Modifier -59, for instance, indicates that procedures are distinct from one another. Use it when two services are indeed separate — say, if they occur in different sessions or on different anatomic sites. But use caution: misuse of modifiers can lead to audits or even accusations of upcoding.

Cross-Check NCCI Edits

Always cross-check your denial against the NCCI edits. These guidelines are public; knowing them helps you prepare a solid argument. If the edit isn't applicable, highlight this in your appeal to the payer.

Appeal with Context

When appealing, clearly articulate why the services should be unbundled. Use specific language from payer policies or NCCI guidelines to support your case. And remember, it's not enough to say "we've always done it this way" — specificity wins.

Collaborate with Clinicians

Sometimes billing and coding teams need direct input from clinicians. If a procedure’s complexity or uniqueness isn't captured by standard codes, consult with the provider. They may provide vital insights or additional documentation to support your claim.

Dealing with Specific Payers

Let’s talk payers. Some are notorious for rigid interpretations of CO 107 (looking at you, Medicare). With these giants, thoroughness and precision are non-negotiable. Aetna, on the other hand, might require additional documentation but tends to be more flexible once appropriate modifiers are used. Know your payer's quirks — some even provide specific guidance on their portals.

When to Let Go

There comes a point when continued appeals are more costly than the potential reimbursement. Calculate the time spent versus the claim amount. If it’s a low-dollar service and appeals are dragging on — consider chalking one up to experience. But don’t make this a habit; each denial should be a learning opportunity for your team.

The Takeaway

CO 107 denials are frustrating but not insurmountable. They require a strategic approach — detailed documentation, tactical use of modifiers, and a clear understanding of payer policies. When effectively managed, these denials become less of a revenue drain and more of a process improvement tool. Remember, unbundling isn’t just about recovering dollars; it’s about asserting the value of your work. Keep refining your approach, and slowly, CO 107 will lose its bite.

Upgrade to Arrow for more features

OpenRCM answers your billing questions. Arrow puts your A/R on autopilot, supercharging your billing team to do more.

  • Automate A/R follow-up

  • Resolve denials faster

  • Track real-time revenue

  • Collaborate with your team in one place

Arrow-CoreExchange

Try OpenRCM for free

Upgrade to Arrow for more features

OpenRCM answers your billing questions. Arrow puts your A/R on autopilot, supercharging your billing team to do more.

  • Automate A/R follow-up

  • Resolve denials faster

  • Track real-time revenue

  • Collaborate with your team in one place

Arrow-CoreExchange
Arrow-CoreExchange

Try OpenRCM for free

Upgrade to Arrow for more features

OpenRCM answers your billing questions. Arrow puts your A/R on autopilot, supercharging your billing team to do more.

  • Automate A/R follow-up

  • Resolve denials faster

  • Track real-time revenue

  • Collaborate with your team in one place

Arrow-CoreExchange
Arrow-CoreExchange

Upgrade to Arrow for more features

OpenRCM answers your billing questions. Arrow puts your A/R on autopilot, supercharging your billing team to do more.

  • Automate A/R follow-up

  • Resolve denials faster

  • Track real-time revenue

  • Collaborate with your team in one place

Arrow-CoreExchange
Arrow-CoreExchange