Denial management is the bane of every revenue cycle management team's existence. The process is grueling, time-consuming, and often thankless. But ignoring it isn't an option; denials can make up 15% of a healthcare practice's revenue loss, and the effort to recover these funds is enormous. Enter Arrow, the AI copilot for medical billers. If you're still relying on manual denial management, it's time to reevaluate. Arrow outpaces traditional workflows in speed, accuracy, and cost savings.
Speed: Putting the Fast in Fast Track
Manual denial management is akin to navigating a maze blindfolded. Each claim denial is a puzzle that requires tracking down the reason, identifying the solution, and then implementing it. The process often involves hold times that rival waitlists for Broadway shows—especially with major payers. With Arrow, this process is exponentially faster.
Arrow's AI can scan thousands of claims in minutes, identifying patterns that would take a human team hours—or even days—to discover. For instance, when dealing with common denial codes like CO 97 (benefit maximum for this timeframe/occurrence has been reached), Arrow can instantly flag related claims, allowing the team to modify and resubmit them without delay.
Accuracy: Precision that Humans Can't Match
Human error is inevitable. No matter how skilled your billing team is, mistakes slip through the cracks. Misreading denial codes, overlooking payer-specific quirks, or simply fat-fingering a number can cost practices thousands. AI doesn't make those errors.
Arrow not only identifies the correct denial reasons but also suggests the best course of action. It's programmed with up-to-date knowledge of payer policies which, anyone who's been on the phone with Anthem or UnitedHealthcare can tell you, is invaluable. This results in fewer appeals, fewer reworked claims, and a significant drop in erroneous write-offs.
Cost Savings: The Bottom Line
Let's talk dollars and cents. A typical mid-sized healthcare practice might spend over $100,000 annually just on the labor for denial management. This doesn't even account for the lost revenue from uncollected denials.
Switching to an AI-driven process like Arrow can cut these costs drastically. Arrow reduces the need for extensive manual labor, freeing up staff to focus on higher-value tasks. And with its higher accuracy and speed, the reclaim rate for denied claims increases, recouping lost revenue that more than offsets any investment in AI technology.
Real-World Impact: A Case Study
Consider a 25-location practice that dealt with an average of 500 denials per month. Before Arrow, their denial management team of three full-time employees was barely keeping up, with a resolution rate of just 60%. After implementing Arrow, not only did they reduce their team to one part-time employee, but their resolution rate soared to 90%.
These changes led to an annual savings of $75,000 in labor costs alone and an additional $50,000 recovered from previously uncollected denials. The numbers speak for themselves.
The Future of Denial Management
AI is here to stay, and frankly, it's a welcome ally in the fight against denials. Practices that fail to adopt AI tools like Arrow risk falling behind, not just in efficiency but financially too. The choice is clear: stick with outdated, laborious processes or embrace a smarter, faster, and more accurate way to manage denials.
Remember, denial management doesn't have to be the nightmare it once was. AI copilots are here to transform it from a daunting task into an efficient, almost effortless part of your revenue cycle. The future of denial management is not just brighter—it's smarter.
Related Articles
